Thursday, March 13, 2014

Shooter bias and stereotypes


Police called to the scene of a crime often face a difficult situation.  There may be one or more potential perpetrators.  There is yelling and screaming.  People are running around.  One or more people may be armed.  In this situation, the police are asked to make split-second decisions about how to proceed.  Failing to shoot an armed suspect could lead a police officer to get shot.  Shooting an unarmed or potentially innocent person can lead to tragedy.

Despite all of their training, mistakes do happen.  And when they happen, they often end up as front-page news.  The news coverage gets particularly heated when White police officers shoot an unarmed African American suspect or an innocent bystander.

Research suggests that there is a bias for White people to shoot unarmed Black suspects more often than unarmed White suspects.  These findings in laboratory studies have been obtained both with trained police officers as well as with college students role-playing as police officers.  This is called the shooter bias.

An interesting set of studies by Saul Miller, Kate Zielaskowski and Ashby Plant in the October, 2012 issue of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin explored why this happens.

One possibility is that there is a pervasive stereotype in the United States that Black men are more dangerous than White men.  One possibility is that this stereotype causes people to be more likely to make the snap decision to shoot a Black man than to shoot a White man.  A second possibility is that people are prone to shoot anyone who belongs to a different social group than they do, and that specific stereotypes about Whites and Blacks are not the primary cause of the shooter bias. 

To explore this issue, college students participated in a simulated shooting task in which they saw faces of men.  The faces were either paired with a gun or with a neutral object.  They had to press a button within 630 milliseconds of the appearance of the face to decide whether to shoot.  The task was to shoot when there was a gun and not to shoot when there was no gun.

In these studies, all participants filled out a questionnaire assessing their belief about whether the world is a dangerous place.  This questionnaire has items like “There are many dangerous people in our society who will attack someone out of pure meanness, for no reason at all.”  The more that someone believes that the world is a dangerous place, the more likely they may be to have a shooter bias.

In the first study, all of the faces were White males.  Participants were given a personality quiz at the start of the experiment and on the basis of that quiz were told that they had either a “Red” or a “Green” personality.  In actuality, the color was randomly assigned to them.  They were given a sticker of their color to wear.  The faces they saw during the study appeared either on a red or a green background, and participants were told that this color reflected the personality of the individual shown. 

In this study, participants who were moderate or low in their belief that the world is dangerous showed no shooter bias.  But, people who were high in their belief that the world is dangerous were more likely to shoot an unarmed person if that individual’s personality color was different from their own than if it was the same.

This result suggests that the shooter bias can happen, even in the absence of a cultural stereotype that a person is dangerous.

In a second study, White college students saw White, Black, and Asian faces.  For this group of students, the cultural stereotype that Black men are dangerous was strong, but there was no cultural stereotype that Asian males are dangerous.  In this study, there was a broad tendency for all participants (regardless of their belief that the world is dangerous) to mistakenly shoot unarmed Black men more often than to shoot either Asian or White men.  For participants whose belief that the world is dangerous, though, they were also more likely to mistakenly shoot Asian men than to shoot White men.

What does all of this mean? 

There seem to be two sources of shooter bias.  First, there are cultural stereotypes (like the stereotype that Black men are dangerous) that influence people’s snap judgments.  On top of that, for people who are already concerned that the world is dangerous, there is a bias against anyone who is in a different group. 

This work suggests that the belief that the world is dangerous is an important factor.  People with a low level of belief that the world is dangerous are much less likely to mistakenly shoot an unarmed person. 

One reason that this finding is important is that many advocates of concealed weapon laws justify the importance of these laws on the premise that the world is a dangerous place.  The idea is that if more people were carrying weapons, then that would make the world safer.  Unfortunately, promoting the belief that the world is dangerous may also promote a mindset that increases the likelihood that innocent people will get shot.  More research should explore this issue.  In addition, future studies should explore whether teaching people that the world is not as dangerous as they think it is can reduce the shooter bias.

2 comments:

  1. Thank you for presenting the information from these studies in a way that is both understandable and meaningful. What really caught my attention is the point that the "belief" that the world is dangerous actually increased the danger in the world, particularly to those of a different group than the one with that belief.

    I often deal in the world of beliefs and how they then manifest in actions in our lives, whether intentional or not. My focus is particularly on stress, anxiety and chronic pain. Beliefs such as "the world is a dangerous place" contribute to an individual's heightened sense of stress, leading to a physical reaction to perceiving a stressful situation, which then changes how our thought process works and our how our bodies react. When making decisions based on the belief that you are in some sort of stressful situation, you may not make the best decisions.

    On another related subject, I used to frequently participate in various surveys and studies. One study asked me, a white woman of small build, how I would react to seeing a group of three black teenage males coming down the street toward me. The question was worded in a way that they wanted a reaction to the teenage males because they were black. Since this wasn't an online survey or one with simple answer only options, I was able to challenge the question and answer it differently. For me, as a woman of small build, the issue was that there were "three" teenage males coming toward me, regardless of color. Teen males are much more likely to do more aggressive or outrageous things when there are three or more of them than if there are one or two. Three of them will get me to perhaps step into a storefront, or change my path, or cross the street. Black or white did not matter in this scenario, because "my" perception dealt with three or more teenage males, not black males or white males. The survey takers did not appreciate me taking apart their survey logic!

    I often have conversations about how the world is not nearly as dangerous as we are led to believe. It is amazing what shifts for a person individually when that belief shifts. I can only imagine what would happen as a society should we shift our beliefs as a whole.

    Regards,
    Paula E. Popper, CCHt
    Inner Peaceworks

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the comment, Paula. I agree that there are many surveys out there that contain hidden assumptions. It is important for survey designers to make sure that they word questions in a way that makes it as clear as possible what the participant means when they answer the question in a particular way.

      Delete